Drake’s defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) has been dismissed by a federal judge. The ruling occurred on October 9, 2023. Judge Jeannette A. Vargas stated that the track in question, Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” is primarily a collection of opinions rather than defamatory claims.
Details of the Court Ruling
Judge Vargas emphasized the context of a competitive rap environment. She noted that the serious allegations against Drake, including claims of being a pedophile, are embedded in the heated exchanges typical of rap battles. The judge highlighted that a reasonable listener would not interpret the lyrics as stating verifiable facts about Drake.
Impact of the Song
Drake’s lawsuit included claims that the track contributed to issues with security at his Toronto home. He alleged that the song’s popularity had resulted in attempts to break into his residence and even led to a shooting involving his security team. Notably, the single’s artwork featured Google Maps imagery of his mansion layered with numerous sex offender markers.
Judge’s Comments on Artwork
In her ruling, Judge Vargas described the artwork as “obviously exaggerated and doctored.” She stated that no reasonable individual would believe the image implied that numerous individuals near Drake’s residence were designated as sex offenders.
Reactions from Drake and UMG
Following the dismissal, Drake’s legal team announced plans to appeal the decision. They expressed their anticipation for a review by the Court of Appeals. In contrast, UMG expressed satisfaction with the ruling, referring to the lawsuit as an attack on artistic expression. They emphasized their commitment to promoting Drake’s music and furthering his career.
- Date of Ruling: October 9, 2023
- Judge: Jeannette A. Vargas
- Song in Question: “Not Like Us” by Kendrick Lamar
- Key Allegation: Defamatory claims against Drake
- Drake’s Stance: Plans to appeal the ruling
- UMG’s Position: Supports free artistic expression
