Hamas has expressed its willingness to accept parts of President Donald Trump’s proposed ceasefire plan for Gaza. This comes in response to Trump’s ultimatum for the group to provide feedback by a specified deadline.
Key Developments in Trump’s Gaza Plan
This past Friday, Hamas communicated its response to Trump’s 20-point ceasefire plan, stating its readiness to negotiate further. Notably, the group affirmed its commitment to releasing all Israeli captives held in Gaza, contingent upon appropriate field conditions for the exchange.
Hamas’ Response and Negotiation Offer
In its statement, Hamas emphasized its openness to discussions through mediators regarding the specifics of the exchange of captives, which includes both living individuals and remains. The group also expressed a willingness to transfer governance of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian body of technocrats, highlighting the need for Arab and Islamic support.
However, Hamas stipulated that the future governance of Gaza and the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people should be determined by a unanimous national position and aligned with relevant international laws.
Context of Trump’s Ultimatum
Trump previously warned through his Truth Social platform that if no agreement was made by Sunday, severe consequences would affect Hamas. His plan notably calls for the disarmament of the group, which was not specifically addressed in Hamas’s statement.
Prospects for Future Negotiations
- Ali Hashem of Al Jazeera highlighted that Hamas’s response could facilitate the potential for further negotiations within the next 48 hours.
- Hamas might have reservations regarding a proposed international transitional body, suggested to be led by former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair.
- The Trump plan reportedly does not offer a clear path for Gaza’s reunification with the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
Concerns have been raised regarding the implications of isolating Gaza from the broader Palestinian narrative, as noted by observers. Both regional and international stakeholders, including Arab and Islamic nations, appear to have differing interpretations of Trump’s plan compared to earlier agreements.
Conclusion
Hamas has indicated a degree of flexibility in its approach to Trump’s Gaza plan, appreciating the efforts of various parties involved in seeking a resolution. Yet, it has also made it clear that certain clarifications and conditions are necessary before any significant advancement in negotiations can occur.
