Arsenal’s significant investment in Viktor Gyokeres, priced at £64 million from Sporting Lisbon, has come under scrutiny. The club’s decision to make him a primary target has raised questions, especially after a sluggish start in the Premier League.
Concerns Over Gyokeres’ Performance
Former footballer Joleon Lescott has publicly criticized Arsenal’s choice to recruit Gyokeres. He pointed out that Arsenal had several promising alternatives, including Joao Pedro and Hugo Ekitike, who seemed to have performed better this season.
Gyokeres, 27, had a stellar season in Portugal, displaying his scoring prowess. However, since arriving in the Premier League, he has struggled, registering just eight goals in 25 appearances. In a recent match against Wolves, where Arsenal drew 2-2, he failed to make an impact yet again.
Comparative Analysis of Strikers
- Viktor Gyokeres: £64 million, 8 goals in 25 matches
- Joao Pedro: £60 million, 10 goals, 4 assists
- Hugo Ekitike: £79 million, 10 goals
Both Pedro and Ekitike, who joined Chelsea and Liverpool respectively, have outperformed Gyokeres this season. Lescott noted that Arsenal seemed to prioritize Gyokeres over these more effective options, which he believes was a strategic misstep.
Criticisms from Experts
Other analysts have echoed Lescott’s sentiments. Dietmar Hamann has expressed doubts about Gyokeres’ capabilities, suggesting he might not possess the skill set required to excel in the Premier League. His form has been heavily scrutinized amid Arsenal’s title aspirations.
As the season progresses, Arsenal will need to reassess their striker options, especially if Gyokeres cannot find his scoring touch.
