Democrats Worry Multiple Candidates Could Hand Governor’s Race to Republicans

As the race for the California governorship heats up, party leaders are facing a mounting concern: the potential splintering of the Democratic vote could create a path for Republicans to seize power in a state where they have not won statewide office since 2006. With nine prominent Democrats vying for the position, strategists within the California Democratic Party are urging candidates who lag in polling to withdraw, hoping to consolidate support behind a single strong contender before the June primary. “California Democrats are prepared to do what’s required… to ensure we have a strong candidate coming out of the primary,” asserted state party chairman Rusty Hicks at the recent Democratic convention.
Splintering Votes and Political Survival
The Democratic primary is shaping up to be not just a contest of ideas but a strategic battle for survival. In contrast to the crowded Democratic field, only two Republicans are competing: conservative commentator Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both currently leading in polls. Early analysis indicates they are tied at 15.5%, with the highest-ranking Democrat, Rep. Eric Swalwell, trailing at 12.5%. This configuration reflects a disturbing historical precedent; in 2012, Republicans advanced in a heavily Democratic district simply by capitalizing on a divided Democratic field.
The Stakes: A Rainbow Coalition or a Republican Takeover?
California’s “jungle primary” system magnifies this risk, permitting the top two candidates—regardless of party affiliation—to advance to the general election. As Democrats recognize that their party’s stronghold is at stake, calls for consolidation are growing. One Democratic delegate, Gregory Hutchins, remarked, “This is a test to see what candidates have a level of support that they can mount a successful campaign.” Meanwhile, Democratic luminaries like former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi insist that fears of a GOP-controlled California are unfounded, emphasizing party unity as the cornerstone of their strategy.
| Stakeholder | Before Candidate Consolidation | Projected Outcomes After Consolidation |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic Party | Multiple strong contenders, risk of GOP advancement | Unified support, higher chances of winning |
| Voters | Confused by too many options | Clear choice, mobilized voter turnout |
| Republican Candidates | Two possible frontrunners | Increased chance to capture top spots |
Navigating the Shift: Internal Party Dynamics
While party leadership is adamant about the need to unify, not all candidates are willing to step aside. Figures like former California Controller Betty Yee and state Superintendent Tony Thurmond reject pressure to abandon their bids, framing it as undemocratic. “This is still a vibrant primary,” stated Thurmond, echoing sentiments that some consider the party’s insistence on consolidation as a panicked overreaction. However, as noted by various party insiders, the urgency of the situation calls for introspection about commitment and viability among the candidates.
Organizations that traditionally align with Democratic candidates, such as Planned Parenthood, also recognize the stakes involved. Lorena Gonzalez of the California Federation of Labor Unions anticipates that her organization will initiate serious discussions with candidates about their paths moving forward, emphasizing the growing consensus on the necessity of streamlining the primary field.
Projected Outcomes: Watching for Key Developments
Looking ahead, three critical outcomes are anticipated as the candidate landscape evolves:
- Field Reduction: Expect a gradual thinning of candidates as pressure mounts, leading to a more focused Democratic strategy by early March.
- Increased Fundraising Alignment: Candidates comfortable with withdrawing might redirect their resources to boost party unity, pooling campaign funds for a concerted effort against Republicans.
- Impact on Voter Sentiment: As candidates consolidate, watch for shifts in polling dynamics, influencing undecided voters’ perceptions and potentially strengthening the Democratic candidate.
The next few weeks will be pivotal for California’s Democratic Party as it navigates the tricky waters of self-preservation while attempting to maintain its diverse coalition. The strategies employed now could very well shape the political landscape of the state through the upcoming election cycle.



