news-uk

Climber Faces Trial for Abandoning Girlfriend on Austria’s Highest Peak

A climber is facing legal repercussions for allegedly abandoning his girlfriend during a perilous ascent of Austria’s highest peak. Prosecutors claim that he neglected to adequately prepare for the expedition, resulting in life-threatening conditions for both climbers.

Background of the Climb

The couple embarked on the challenging climb despite adverse winter conditions. Prosecutors allege the man started the journey two hours later than planned. Furthermore, they claim he did not carry sufficient emergency equipment for a high-altitude expedition.

  • The girlfriend reportedly used inappropriate footwear, compromising her safety.
  • Prosecutors noted he ignored severe weather warnings, with winds reaching up to 74 km/h (45 mph) and temperatures plummeting to -8°C (-20°C with wind chill).

Disputed Claims of Experience and Preparation

Defense attorney Kurt Jelinek argued that both climbers were adequately prepared and had relevant Alpine experience. According to him, they had planned the trip together and felt confident in their abilities. The couple was said to be in good physical condition, prepared for the ascent.

Key Events on the Mountain

On January 18, at 1:30 PM, the climbers reached a milestone known as Frühstücksplatz, a critical point on their route. Jelinek asserted that neither climber felt exhausted at this stage and thus chose to continue toward the summit.

However, prosecutors contend that things took a turn for the worse. They claim the couple became stuck approximately seven hours later, around 8:50 PM. At this critical moment, the boyfriend reportedly failed to call for help, even when a police helicopter flew overhead at 10:50 PM.

Final Moments of the Ascent

The defense maintains that both climbers were in good spirits and did not perceive the need for assistance, believing they were close to reaching the peak. Webcam images captured their ascent, showing the lights of their torches illuminating the night.

This trial raises questions about responsibility in high-risk situations and the importance of proper preparation for mountaineering endeavors. The prosecution and defense present starkly contrasting interpretations of the events that unfolded on that fateful day.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button