Health Psychology: Key Questions and Answers

The recent enactment of the Act of January 23, 2026, regarding the profession of psychology has stirred considerable discussion surrounding the transitional provisions for students. As the world grapples with mental health crises, the establishment of a regulated Register of Psychologists serves as a strategic necessity. This move not only professionalizes the field but also raises pertinent questions about accessibility and qualification standards in health psychology.
Understanding the Transitional Regulations
The transitional provisions are crucial for students who commenced their unified master’s studies in health psychology before the Act’s enforcement. These students will be eligible to apply for registration with the new Register of Psychologists after completing their degrees, assuming they meet additional formal requirements. Article 161 of the Act emphasizes the timeline for its implementation, key for assessing which graduating cohorts fall under these transitional measures.
Implications for Current Students
Immediate actions are not required from existing students; they can focus on completing their degrees without the pressure of navigating new regulations. The higher education institutions are preparing informative FAQs to clarify the transitional provisions and are actively monitoring the Act’s implementation. This administrative diligence indicates a commitment to ensure that the education provided aligns with the revised legal framework.
| Stakeholder | Before the Act | After the Act |
|---|---|---|
| Current Students | No formal registration requirement; uncertainty about future qualifications. | Allowed to register post-graduation; clarity on qualification path. |
| Institutions | Autonomy in program structuring; ambiguous legal requirements. | Need for program alignment with legal standards; structured FAQ dissemination. |
| Future Graduates | Focus solely on academic credentials. | Must fulfill additional qualifications for registration; potential barriers to entry. |
Broader Context and Local Ripple Effects
This legislative change reflects a global shift toward formalizing mental health professions, aligning with similar trends in countries like the US, UK, Canada, and Australia. Worldwide, there is increasing recognition of the necessity for standardized qualifications to safeguard public welfare and enhance the credibility of mental health practitioners. The ripple effect of Poland’s reform may inspire parallel measures in other nations facing similar challenges in regulating mental health services.
Projected Outcomes
Looking ahead, three key developments are likely to emerge:
- Increased Enrollment: The clarity provided by the new law may lead to heightened interest in psychology programs, as prospective students recognize defined paths to professional credentialing.
- Enhanced Standards: Educational institutions may elevate their curricula to meet the new legal requirements, improving the overall quality of training in psychology.
- Potential Backlash: Existing students may voice concerns regarding the transitional provisions, especially those nearing graduation who may feel unprepared for the added requirements of registration.
In conclusion, the implementation of the Act on the profession of psychology marks a critical turning point. By establishing a formal Register of Psychologists, Poland is taking strides toward a more regulated and professionalized field, echoing broader global trends in health psychology.




