Stephen King’s recent remarks about the fatal shooting of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent in Minneapolis have provoked considerable backlash. The author’s comments, shared via X, questioned the assertion that the agent, Jonathan Ross, had been run over by Good’s vehicle. King stated that the “visual evidence shows no indication” of such an event.
Background of the Incident
The incident occurred on January 7, during which Good was shot by ICE agent Jonathan Ross. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported that Ross sustained internal bleeding as a result of the encounter. However, this claim has been met with skepticism by some observers.
Reactions to King’s Comment
King’s statement quickly attracted attention on social media, sparking heated debates. Critics argued that while no one claimed Ross was “run over,” videos depicted an incident involving Good’s vehicle striking the agent. Comments surfaced questioning the severity of Ross’s injuries, with some linking the internal bleeding report as evidence of injury.
- Gunther Eagleman, a MAGA influencer, expressed that videos depicted Good attempting to harm the ICE agent.
- Right-wing user Catturd, who has 4 million followers, ridiculed King’s observation.
- Several pro-Trump accounts echoed similarly critical sentiments towards King.
On the other hand, many users supported King, pointing out that video evidence showed Ross appearing uninjured while walking away from the scene.
Political Commentary
President Donald Trump commented following the incident, stating that Good had indeed “run over” the ICE agent. Conversely, Minnesota officials, including Mayor Jacob Frey, disputed this narrative, suggesting the agent’s actions were not justifiable given the context.
Ongoing Investigations
The shooting has intensified calls for protests against ICE in Minneapolis. An FBI investigation is currently underway, complicated by actions from federal officials that have limited state access to evidence. Good’s family has retained the law firm Romanucci & Blandin to pursue their own investigation.
The controversy surrounding this case exemplifies the broader divisions in today’s political climate. The stark differences in viewpoints underscore the challenges of addressing law enforcement issues in a charged atmosphere.
