Arman Tsarukyan Highlights UFC’s Double Standard

Arman Tsarukyan has sparked discussions regarding the UFC’s perceived double standard in handling fighter behavior. With UFC 324 set to take place on January 24 at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas, this topic has gained renewed attention as Justin Gaethje and Paddy Pimblett prepare to battle for the interim lightweight title.
Arman Tsarukyan’s Case
Despite being a strong contender, Tsarukyan was passed over for a title shot in favor of more marketable fighters. In recent statements, UFC CEO Dana White indicated that Tsarukyan’s actions during the ceremonial weigh-ins, specifically a head butt directed at Dan Hooker, influenced this decision. As a result, many fans and analysts believe Tsarukyan was unjustly denied this opportunity.
Incident at Weigh-Ins
The weigh-in incident has raised questions about the UFC’s policies on fighter conduct. While Hooker claimed no harm was done and welcomed the intensity, the act itself highlights a crucial issue: violence has no place at official weigh-ins.
Comparative Treatment of Fighters
The UFC has faced criticism for its inconsistent handling of fighter infractions. For instance, Conor McGregor’s infamous bus attack, which resulted in injuries, did not lead to any significant punishment. Instead of a ban, McGregor was granted a title shot against Khabib Nurmagomedov shortly after the incident. This raises questions about fairness in the UFC’s disciplinary measures.
Examples of Double Standards
- McGregor’s bus attack resulted in criminal charges but no UFC sanctions.
- Jon Jones faced no immediate repercussions for a physical altercation with Daniel Cormier.
- Tsarukyan’s minor infraction has opened discussions about how the UFC rewards fame over behavior.
Many wonder why a fighter like Tsarukyan, who has only one loss in his last 11 fights, would receive a harsher response than more famous fighters who have engaged in serious misconduct. This disparity has fueled conversations around the UFC’s prioritization of marketability over ethical behavior.
Future Implications for Fighters
As Tsarukyan looks for ways to regain recognition, he may need to tread carefully. Fighters in the UFC often feel pressured to engage in antics to gain attention, reflecting a culture where controversy can lead to greater visibility.
While Dana White has mentioned the UFC doesn’t need another McGregor, the organization’s actions suggest otherwise. The focus should be on creating a consistent standard for all fighters, regardless of their marketability.
In conclusion, the UFC finds itself at a crossroads. The organization must balance the allure of stardom with the need for fair and consistent treatment across the board. Moving forward, fighters like Tsarukyan deserve a fair chance based on merit, rather than a subjective measure of their market appeal.




