U.S. District Court Judge Zahid Quraishi is scheduled to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding New Jersey’s new affordable housing law. This hearing could lead to significant delays in implementing the law, especially concerning a critical zoning deadline.
Background of the Affordable Housing Law
The affordable housing law, enacted nearly two years ago, aims to tackle the severe shortage of affordable housing in New Jersey. Current estimates suggest that approximately 150,000 affordable housing units are needed throughout the state.
Legal Challenges from Municipalities
A coalition of around 36 municipalities has filed a federal lawsuit to challenge the criteria used by the state to determine affordable housing obligations. Their legal representative, Michael Collins, has requested Judge Quraishi to impose an injunction by March 15, 2026, urging municipalities to create their own guidelines. Failure to do so could result in the state implementing its own standards.
- Injunction request by March 15, 2026
- Coalition composed of about 36 municipalities
- Need for approximately 150,000 affordable housing units
Responses from Local Leaders
Montvale Mayor Mike Ghassali, leading the coalition, expressed his intentions to testify about the potential harm the state’s deadline could impose on local communities. He emphasized the need for a pause in the deadlines for high-density housing requirements until their legal challenges are resolved.
Previous Legal Proceedings
In October, Superior Court Judge Robert Lougy dismissed a previous lawsuit filed by the coalition, titled Local Leaders for Responsible Planning. Lougy noted the importance of fulfilling constitutional obligations related to affordable housing. He stressed the essential roles of the legislative and executive branches in this process.
Upcoming Hearing Details
The evidentiary hearing before Judge Quraishi is scheduled for January 7. This event will provide an opportunity for the municipalities to present their arguments regarding the state law and its implications.
Collins stated, “My clients are grateful for this opportunity to be heard on their request to pause the impending deadline while their equal protection challenge proceeds in federal court.”
