An intense shootout thrillingly concluded with the Anaheim Ducks edging the Washington Capitals, but not without controversy. The deciding moment revolved around Leo Carlsson’s shootout attempt.
Ducks Edge Capitals in Thrilling Shootout Victory
During the shootout, the Situation Room initiated a critical video review to assess the legality of Carlsson’s attempt. This review followed Rule 37.3 (j), which outlines the conditions that must be met for a penalty shot or shootout goal to be deemed legitimate.
Key Points from the Review
- Leo Carlsson’s shootout attempt was scrutinized for compliance with the rules.
- The review focused on whether Carlsson double-tapped the puck before it crossed the goal line.
- Several factors are considered in such reviews, including puck height and goalkeeper actions.
Ultimately, the Situation Room ruled that Carlsson had indeed double-tapped the puck. Consequently, his attempt did not result in a goal.
This decision maintained the tension of the match until the very end, highlighting the intricacies of shootout rules and the crucial role of video review in modern hockey.
