New York Attorney General’s Lawyers Aim to Disqualify US Attorney in Court

New York Attorney General’s Legal Maneuvers Against US Attorney
The New York Attorney General’s office is preparing to contest the legitimacy of a US attorney in a federal court on Thursday. This legal move seeks to disqualify John Sarcone from overseeing an investigation related to the civil case against former President Donald Trump.
Background on the Case
Letitia James, the Attorney General of New York, argues that Sarcone, who was appointed by the Trump administration, should not hold his position as acting US attorney for the Northern District of New York. In this challenge, James aims to dismiss subpoenas signed by Sarcone that seek records in the Trump Organization’s financial investigations and a case involving the National Rifle Association (NRA).
Court Hearing Details
The court hearing, presided over by Judge Lorna Schofield, will focus exclusively on Sarcone’s appointment. Should the court rule that the appointment is improper, it could lead to the invalidation of the subpoenas he issued.
- James is not expected to attend the hearing.
- This is part of a broader challenge to the Trump administration’s nominations for US attorney positions.
Appointment Controversy
Sarcone was initially named an interim US attorney in March by Attorney General Pam Bondi. After his 120-day term, no new appointments were made by district court judges. In July, Bondi designated Sarcone as special attorney and first assistant US attorney, allowing him to assume the role of acting US attorney.
Subpoena Challenge
In August, Sarcone issued two subpoenas related to allegations of constitutional rights violations during state investigations. The New York Attorney General’s lawyers criticized these actions, declaring that Sarcone lacks legitimate authority as acting US attorney, rendering the subpoenas unauthorized.
Government’s Defense
The Justice Department, however, maintains that Sarcone’s appointment is valid. They argue that even if it were not, his status as a special attorney allows him to carry out grand jury procedures. The DOJ contends that the New York Attorney General’s request to quash the subpoenas lacks legal grounds.
Judicial Precedents
This situation follows prior rulings where judges found other US attorney appointments under the Trump administration unlawful. On Monday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a ruling that invalidated the appointment of Alina Habba as acting US attorney for New Jersey.
Ongoing Investigations
Currently, Sarcone’s office is involved in two significant lawsuits:
- A 2022 lawsuit by Letitia James against Donald Trump and the Trump Organization for allegedly inflating property values to obtain favorable loan and insurance rates. A judge has already ruled Trump and his adult sons liable for fraud.
- A lawsuit against the NRA for violating nonprofit laws, where evidence suggests mismanagement of charitable funds.
As these cases continue to unfold, the implications of Sarcone’s appointment and the challenges from the New York Attorney General’s office remain under sharp judicial scrutiny.




