RDS Members Oppose Using Laya Arena Name for Showgrounds

Recent discussions regarding the Royal Dublin Society (RDS) arena have sparked significant debate among its members. The controversy revolves around the decision to officially name the venue “Laya Arena” as part of a new sponsorship agreement.
Background of the Sponsorship Deal
The relationship between Laya Healthcare and the RDS began in 2015. The health insurance company sought naming rights to support a planned €52 million redevelopment of the aging stadium. This upgrade aims to modernize the venue, which hosts events for prominent entities such as Leinster Rugby and the Dublin Horse Show.
Formal Confirmation of the Deal
This week marked a pivotal moment, as the sponsorship agreement was formally confirmed. The redevelopment is expected to be completed by summer 2024, creating a refreshed environment for various events. Being associated with the RDS has already proven beneficial for Laya’s marketing strategy over the past decade.
Concerns Among RDS Members
Following the announcement, RDS leadership issued a communication to its 2,900 members. Paul Kelly, the RDS CEO, emphasized the importance of adopting the new name, stating that it would foster a stronger relationship with Laya. He expressed that failure to embrace the “Laya Arena” name could hinder potential future partnerships.
Member Reactions to the Directive
- Some members have reacted negatively to the directive from RDS leadership.
- A feeling of being told what to call their cherished venue has led to dissatisfaction.
- Many members still consider the RDS to be just that—regardless of sponsorship naming.
Future Implications for RDS
With a rich history spanning 294 years, the RDS faces challenges in balancing tradition with modern commercial demands. As the organization heads into a new era under Kelly’s leadership, navigating member sentiments while securing essential sponsorships will be crucial.
The ongoing discussions about the Laya Arena name highlight the complexities that arise when commercial interests intersect with longstanding cultural sentiments within the community. The RDS must find a path that respects tradition while embracing necessary updates for financial viability.




