Republican lawmakers in Utah are set to appeal the new congressional map established by Judge Dianna Gibson. This decision follows a legal defeat in the state’s ongoing redistricting controversy. House Speaker Mike Schultz and Senate President Stuart Adams announced their intention to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court on November 25, 2025.
Special Session Planned for December
In response to the recent ruling, lawmakers will hold a special session on December 9 to propose a constitutional amendment. This amendment aims to ensure legislative authority over district boundaries and prevent ballot initiatives, like the 2018 Better Boundaries initiative, from overriding state constitutional provisions.
- Governor’s Support: Gov. Spencer Cox expressed full backing for the constitutional amendment. He shared concerns over a system governed by direct democracy and highlighted the importance of representative governance.
- Legal Challenges: The new boundaries implemented for the 2026 elections have prompted Republican leaders to announce their appeal against Gibson’s decision. They argue this map disproportionately favors Democratic representation.
- Candidacy Timeline: Legislative leaders may extend the candidate filing period, currently set for January 2, to accommodate their appeal effort.
Concerns Over Public Representation
Adams emphasized that this initiative is about maintaining the integrity of legislative decisions. He reassured the public that the proposed amendment is not politically motivated but rather a means to uphold proper representation.
- Critique from Advocates: Elizabeth Rasmussen of Better Boundaries criticized the lawmakers’ strategy. She pointed out that this amendment could diminish public participation in the political process.
- Democratic Opposition: House and Senate Democrats condemned the call for a special session. They argue that using taxpayer funds for a legal challenge is financially irresponsible.
Historical Context of Redistricting in Utah
The recent conflict is part of a broader struggle following the Legislature’s attempt to repeal the 2018 Better Boundaries initiative, which called for an independent redistricting process. The Utah Supreme Court previously ruled that such repeals must respect voters’ rights to initiate changes in government.
In 2024, the Legislature sought an amendment called Amendment D to allow lawmakers to amend initiatives. However, the Supreme Court deemed the ballot language misleading and struck it down. As a result, the Legislature must now comply with the findings of Judge Gibson, who asserted that the previously implemented GOP map was a violation of Proposition 4.
Amid these developments, some GOP lawmakers hinted at possible impeachment proceedings against Judge Gibson. However, Speaker Schultz clarified that impeachment is not currently a focus. Instead, the emphasis remains on upholding the constitution while addressing the redistricting challenges facing the state.
