Candace Owens has recently raised intriguing questions regarding the Charlie Kirk shooting incident. During a livestream with Myron Gaines on November 18, 2025, she detailed her concerns about the event’s narrative.
Candace Owens Questions the Official Narrative
Owens expressed skepticism about the available information concerning the shooting of Charlie Kirk. She stated that the public has not seen the exact moment of the shooting, only snippets of footage showing a person fleeing the scene. This lack of comprehensive evidence led her to believe that the details presented to the public are incomplete.
Claims of Involvement by Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs
At the center of the discussion is Tyler Robinson, the individual accused of firing at Kirk. While Owens confirmed that Robinson’s fingerprints were found on the weapon, she noted that other fingerprints were also present. This, according to her, suggests a more complex involvement. Furthermore, she introduced Lance Twiggs as a potential key player in the incident, hinting that he might have played a significant role.
- Tyler Robinson: Accused shooter with fingerprints on the gun but believed to have a limited involvement.
- Lance Twiggs: Alleged partner of Robinson, possibly more involved in the setup.
Owens articulated her belief that the scenario could be a coordinated effort involving multiple individuals, rather than a lone actor. She mentioned significant gaps in the narrative that do not align with her analysis of the facts presented thus far.
Supporting Evidence and Observations
Owens referenced a TMZ video from September 13, which featured a figure approaching Utah Valley University before the shooting. She argued that the individual in the video, who was dressed in a maroon shirt, black cap, and light shorts, resembled Twiggs more than Robinson, further supporting her theory of a broader conspiratorial design.
In her view, the Charlie Kirk shooting could have used “patsies” for a larger plan, where each person had a distinct but minor role. This method, she asserts, adds layers of complexity to the overall situation, making it appear larger than it may truly be.
Conclusion
Candace Owens’ remarks have sparked discussions surrounding the details of the Charlie Kirk shooting. With her claims about Tyler Robinson and Lance Twiggs, she emphasizes the need for further investigation into the circumstances of the incident. As new insights emerge, the conversation continues to evolve.
