University Expert Warns: AI Is Not an All-Powerful Deity

Ana Lazcano, the director of the University Institute of Artificial Intelligence at Francisco de Vitoria University, recently shared her insights on the limitations of AI. She emphasized that AI should not be viewed as an all-powerful deity, but rather as a complement to human capabilities. Lazcano’s remarks highlight the need for critical thinking as society navigates the rapid advancements in technology.
The Role of the University Institute of Artificial Intelligence
The University Institute of Artificial Intelligence was established to develop a cohesive understanding of AI across various disciplines. According to Lazcano, this unified approach is essential as AI significantly influences many fields. She stated, “It is a discipline that has arrived like a tsunami,” and the institute brings together experts from diverse backgrounds including philosophy, anthropology, engineering, and psychology.
Four Pillars of the Institute
- Training: Educating students not only in technical skills but also in ethical challenges posed by AI.
- Research: Generating valuable insights that inform practical applications of AI.
- Technology Transfer and Application: Helping society harness AI effectively.
- Dissemination: Creating quality content that encourages critical thinking about AI.
Ethical Considerations and Practical Applications
Lazcano pointed to the ethical implications of AI use. She argued that society must define clear objectives for AI—whether to replace human work or to serve as a complementary tool. This approach aligns with a Catholic perspective, which encourages understanding and cautious engagement with technology.
She stated, “We must not attribute qualities to AI that it does not possess. The more we prioritize human knowledge, the better we can utilize AI.”
Impacts on Education
The introduction of AI into universities presents both opportunities and challenges. Lazcano noted that universities must adapt their teaching, learning, and assessment methods to meet the demands of a technology-driven environment. Students often have more advanced knowledge of AI tools than their instructors, creating a significant gap.
To address this, she called for a technological support model that highlights the importance of embracing AI as a transformative force in education. “This is a small but significant revolution,” she asserted, aiming to foster debate and critical thinking among students.
Looking Forward
Lazcano maintains a positive outlook on the future of education in light of AI advancements. She believes this shift could lead back to the foundational concept of the university as a space for dialogue and learning. “Once we stabilize, we can prioritize critical thinking again,” she concluded, positioning AI as a tool that enhances rather than diminishes the educational experience.
This conversation emphasizes that AI is not an omnipotent force but a tool that must be understood and integrated thoughtfully to benefit society. The establishment of institutions like the University Institute of Artificial Intelligence plays a crucial role in shaping how future generations engage with this rapidly evolving technology.



