Experts Debate Financial Impact on Brissett and Murray’s NFL Futures

The Arizona Cardinals face a significant decision regarding their quarterback situation as the team’s performance and financial implications come into sharp focus. Experts are debating whether to continue with Jacoby Brissett or revert to Kyler Murray as the starting quarterback.
Comparing Performance: Brissett vs. Murray
Jacoby Brissett has led the Cardinals to an offensive average of 25.7 points per game. This performance comes despite missing key running backs due to injuries. Currently, Brissett ranks 10th in the NFL for passer rating.
In contrast, Kyler Murray has struggled this season. His record stands at 2-3, with the team scoring 20.6 points per game when he was on the field. Murray’s passer rating is a lowly 22nd in the league.
Financial Considerations
The financial aspects of the decision complicate the quarterback debate. Murray is locked into a substantial contract, with a base salary of $22.8 million for the next season and a projected $53.3 million cap hit. His guaranteed money extends through the 2026 season, making him difficult to trade or demote without serious financial ramifications.
- Murray’s contract details:
- Base salary: $22.8 million (2024)
- Roster bonus: $17 million
- Cap hit: $53.3 million
- Guaranteed money: $36.8 million (until 2026)
Expert Opinions on the Decision
The discussion surrounding Brissett and Murray has attracted varied opinions from former NFL players and analysts. Highlights include:
- Bruce Arians: The former head coach is convinced Murray will resume his role upon recovery, citing the financial stakes involved.
- Troy Aikman: He argues performance should take precedence over salaries, suggesting Brissett deserves to continue as starter.
- Drew Brees: Raised questions about Murray’s role as the franchise quarterback, noting team morale boosts with Brissett.
- Jeff Saturday: He believes business decisions will favor Murray, regardless of Brissett’s superior performance.
- Ryan Clark: Emphasized winning games and the players’ belief in Brissett as factors favoring his continued starting role.
Conclusion
The Cardinals must weigh the implications of their quarterback decision carefully. As the season progresses, the balance between financial commitments and team performance will dictate the future direction for the franchise. Whether the Cardinals can capitalize on Brissett’s effectiveness while managing Murray’s contract remains a critical question for the team’s leadership.


