In recent discussions surrounding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in academia, English professors are innovating methods to prevent AI use among students. With no formal departmental policy established, educators have adopted varied approaches to address the challenges posed by AI in their classrooms.
Concerns Over AI’s Impact on Writing and Thinking
Stefanie Markovits, Director of Undergraduate Studies, stated that the absence of a departmental policy likely stems from a commitment to academic freedom. However, many English professors agree that AI can hinder critical thinking and original writing.
David Bromwich, a Sterling professor of English, expressed that AI serves as a shortcut in developing students’ thoughts and writing abilities. He emphasized the importance of students learning to think independently and express themselves authentically.
Varied Classroom Approaches
While Markovits enforces a no-AI policy for essays, she acknowledges that some colleagues explore constructive uses of AI. She has emphasized the importance of clearly communicating AI policies for individual classes and assignments.
- Markovits prefers not to use AI detection tools due to their unreliability.
- Professors like Rasheed Tazudeen have implemented strict no-tech policies, banning laptops in class to encourage connection and genuine interaction without AI interference.
- Theater professor Deborah Margolin believes AI cannot replicate the human voice crucial in playwriting.
Encouraging Original Thought
Tazudeen’s approach includes providing notebooks to students and requiring printed readings. He believes this format fosters a more meaningful learning environment. “I want to know what the students think,” he remarked.
Margolin’s assignment structure does not specifically address AI but relies heavily on the creativity inherent in human writing. She expects originality from her students and has set high standards for their work.
Academic Integrity and AI
Markovits highlighted that using AI without professor approval detracts from the educational process. The act of writing should enrich students’ understanding of literature and building arguments, she noted. Tazudeen agrees, insisting that the struggle in writing is essential for artistic development.
Should Tazudeen suspect a paper is AI-generated, he engages students in discussions to address their work and encourages revisions. His approach aims to promote originality rather than instill fear of penalties.
The Future of English Education
Markovits remains optimistic that most English majors value the “human craft of writing.” She anticipates a rise in in-class writing exercises to counterbalance potential AI distractions.
Despite the challenges presented by AI, Tazudeen has not observed significant changes in writing quality among his students. He believes dedicated students will continue to excel regardless of technological advancements.
As the education landscape shifts, professors will need to adapt their teaching strategies to maintain the integrity of writing. English was noted as the seventh-most popular major at Yale for the 2024-25 school year, underscoring the ongoing significance of traditional writing skills.
