A U.S. federal judge recently dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by Toronto rapper Drake against Universal Music Group (UMG). The case revolved around Kendrick Lamar’s diss track titled “Not Like Us,” which Drake claimed contained harmful allegations.
Court Ruling on Defamation Suit
On Thursday, Judge Jeannette A. Vargas issued a ruling, stating that the words in Lamar’s track were opinion-based rather than factual. This key determination led to the dismissal of the lawsuit.
Background of the Lawsuit
Drake filed the lawsuit in January, asserting that UMG published and promoted the track, which included false allegations of pedophilia against him. He argued that these claims not only damaged his reputation but also led to violence at his home in Toronto.
- The lawsuit accused the track of promoting vigilante justice.
- Drake claimed it decreased the value of his brand.
Universal Music Group’s Response
UMG, which is the parent label for both artists, strongly denied Drake’s allegations. The label argued that the track was a form of artistic expression and protected under the First Amendment.
Kendrick Lamar’s Performance
Adding to the controversy, Kendrick Lamar performed “Not Like Us” to a sold-out audience in Toronto, creating significant buzz about the ongoing feud. This performance, combined with the legal issues, has kept public interest high.
The dismissal of this lawsuit marks a significant moment in the ongoing rivalry between these two prominent figures in the music industry. As the legal landscape evolves, fans and observers continue to follow developments closely.
