news-ca

Maldives Police Raid Adhadhu Newsroom, Impose Travel Bans on Editor, CEO

On April 27, 2026, Maldivian police conducted a raid on the newsroom of the independent news outlet Adhadhu, located in Malé. This operation resulted in the seizure of several electronic devices, prompting significant concerns regarding press freedom in the region.

Background of the Raid at Adhadhu

The police action was authorized by a court order following the release of a documentary titled “Aisha.” This documentary featured serious allegations of sexual misconduct and abuse of power against President Mohamed Muizzu, brought forth by a former employee in the President’s Office.

Legal Basis for the Police Operation

The raid was initiated under Section 612(a) of the Penal Code, which addresses the offense of “Qazf,” or false accusation of adultery, according to Islamic law. This legal leverage has raised concerns about its use to suppress critical journalism.

Consequences for Adhadhu Staff

  • The police also imposed travel bans on key Adhadhu personnel, including CEO Hussain Fiyaz Moosa and Managing Editor Hassan Mohamed.
  • Critics argue that these measures are attempts to silence independent journalism.

Official Response to the Raid

Minister of Homeland Security Ali Ihusaan defended the actions of the police, asserting that spreading false accusations is not a form of journalism. He emphasized the need for accountability and adherence to the rule of law, stating that no one, including journalists, is above the law.

Implications for Press Freedom

This raid and the actions against Adhadhu highlight an ongoing struggle for press freedom in the Maldives. Kunal Majumder, the Asia-Pacific Program Coordinator for the Committee to Protect Journalists, criticized the authorities for attempting to criminalize investigative journalism under the guise of religious and national interests.

Majumder’s statements underline the chilling precedent set by using religious laws to circumvent media regulations. The situation at Adhadhu serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of protecting the rights of journalists to hold power to account, particularly in politically sensitive environments.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button