A divisive divorce case involving a wealthy couple has escalated following revelations regarding concealed property acquisitions. The wife, Mona, discovered that her husband, Cedric, had secretly purchased a $26 million villa in Saint-Tropez and a $12 million residence in Quebec using a straw buyer. These revelations surfaced as the court prepared to finalize the couple’s divorce proceedings.
Details of the Divorce Case
The presiding judge, Bernard Jolin, highlighted that these new findings could significantly affect Cedric’s credibility, particularly regarding Mona’s claims for child support. This case has gained notoriety, starting in early 2025, with emotions running high as court proceedings unfolded.
Key Facts
- Cedric’s Properties: A $12 million residence in Quebec and a $26 million villa in Saint-Tropez.
- Court Proceedings: Over 40 witnesses testified in a 25-day hearing.
- Monetary Claims: Mona seeks $297 million for unjust enrichment claims.
- Judicial Comments: Judge Bernard Synott characterized the legal battle as an expensive “judicial guerrilla.”
Concealment of Assets
In August, Mona requested the reopening of evidence after learning about Cedric’s late acquisitions ahead of their divorce trial. Cedric used a board member of his firm as a nominee buyer, claiming it was for “security” and “confidentiality.” This residence was purchased outright without a mortgage.
During the divorce proceedings, Cedric failed to disclose these properties, despite being questioned about his global assets. Mona asserts that the use of a nominee buyer is a tactic to mislead her about his lifestyle, which appears more affluent than claimed.
Impact on Child Support Claims
The primary issue lies in the potential impact on child support determinations. Mona claims $45,000 per month, which Cedric’s attorneys argue is based on an unrealistic budget reflecting a disassociated lifestyle. Judge Jolin acknowledged that the newly presented evidence could influence the court’s final ruling on the divorce and child support, scheduled for spring.
Public Interest and Future Proceedings
The case has attracted significant media attention, with various interim rulings and a tumultuous courtroom atmosphere. As the focus shifts to the impending final judgment, the sincerity and credibility of both parties will likely play a crucial role in the court’s final decision.
