Trump Engages with Colombian President Petro as Tensions Rise; Called “Very Positive”

In a significant diplomatic development, former President Donald Trump engaged in a phone conversation with Colombian President Gustavo Petro. This dialogue comes in the wake of escalating tensions between their administrations, particularly concerning drug production and military actions.
Positive Engagement Between Trump and Petro
During their call, President Trump expressed appreciation for Petro’s tone, indicating a potential thaw in relations. He mentioned plans for a future meeting at the White House, highlighting a shift in their dialogue. This interaction is seen as a constructive step and was described by a Colombian official as “very positive” and a “180° change” in rhetoric.
Key Issues Discussed
Petro addressed various disagreements, particularly regarding drug policy and the relationship between the United States and Latin America. The Colombian leader emphasized the need for partnership based on U.S. investments in energy rather than an exclusive focus on oil. He also displayed a symbolic image of a jaguar and a bald eagle embracing, reflecting hopes for cooperation.
- Drug Policy: The call involved discussions on Colombia’s drug situation amid accusations from the Trump administration.
- Military Concerns: Both leaders shared views on U.S. military presence and actions in Latin America.
- Future Cooperation: Petro believes in an American alliance that expands beyond oil interests.
Tensions Leading to the Call
The backdrop to this conversation includes months of strained relations. Trump previously labeled Petro an “illegal drug leader” and the U.S. implemented sanctions against him and his family. These sanctions stemmed from claims that Petro allowed drug cartels to thrive. Petro has criticized U.S. military strategies near Colombia, including recent military actions against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which he termed aggressive.
Reactions from Both Leaders
Trump has made incendiary remarks about Colombia’s leadership, stating that it is “sick” and questioning Petro’s governance. In turn, Petro has firmly opposed these views and stated he would resort to arms if necessary, despite his commitment to non-violence.
As this relationship evolves, both leaders seem to be seeking pathways to collaboration, moving past the rhetoric of recent months. El-Balad will continue to monitor developments in U.S.-Colombia relations as they unfold.




