Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly has voiced her concerns regarding the Trump administration’s military strategy in Venezuela. During an episode of The Megyn Kelly Show on Monday, she expressed reservations about the administration’s operations following the capture of Nicolás Maduro, the Venezuelan leader. Despite her pro-Trump and pro-military stance, Kelly emphasized the importance of caution in this situation.
Criticism of Fox News Coverage
Kelly criticized her former employer, Fox News, for what she perceived as a lack of skeptical reporting on the military operation. She stated, “It was like watching Russian propaganda,” referring to their coverage as purely celebratory. This sentiment raised alarms for Kelly, who underscored the need for a more critical assessment of US military interventions.
Historical Context of Military Interventions
Highlighting past US military actions in Iraq and Libya, Kelly noted that these interventions often ended poorly. She cautioned against blindly supporting military involvement abroad, stating, “Usually, it leads to a quagmire.” Kelly reflected on her previous experience at Fox News, describing feelings of embarrassment over the network’s uncritical support for US military actions.
Concerns Over Military Footprint
Kelly expressed deep discomfort with President Trump’s suggestion of “boots on the ground” in Venezuela. Speaking from a parental perspective, she articulated her hesitation to join the prevalent support from some media circles. She stated, “I’m staying in yellow territory until we know more,” indicating her desire for more information before supporting the military operation.
Reactions to Lindsey Graham
Kelly specifically criticized Senator Lindsey Graham, who publicly supported Trump’s military approach during an appearance on Air Force One. She expressed concern that Graham’s enthusiasm served as a warning sign to her. “When Lindsey Graham is cheering, I’m not,” she remarked, highlighting the skepticism surrounding neoconservative endorsements of military actions.
Future Implications for Venezuela
Further complicating the situation, President Trump commented on the financial aspects of rebuilding Venezuela’s infrastructure. He suggested that the process would be costly, implicating oil companies as key players in restoration efforts. Trump indicated that taxpayers may ultimately bear the financial burden in this endeavor, asserting the potential for a substantial commitment from the US.
Key Takeaways
- User skepticism about military operations in Venezuela
- Concerns regarding uncritical media coverage
- Historical precedents of military intervention failures
- Implications of Senator Graham’s support for the administration
- Potential financial commitment of US taxpayers in Venezuelan reconstruction
