Did the Canucks Err in Trading Away Star Forward?

The Vancouver Canucks’ decision to trade star forward Bo Horvat has sparked debate nearly three years after the fact. On January 30, 2023, Horvat was dealt to the New York Islanders. In return, Vancouver received a 2023 first-round pick, Anthony Beauvillier, and Aatu Räty.
Assessing the Horvat Trade Decision
Since the trade, key discussions have emerged regarding whether the Canucks made the right choice. Earlier that season, uncertainty loomed over Head Coach Bruce Boudreau’s future. The offseason contract extension for J.T. Miller hinted at the team’s intentions to move on from Horvat.
In the aftermath of the trade, the Canucks hired Rick Tocchet as head coach. The results of the trade can be evaluated from various angles. Currently, only Aatu Räty remains with the Canucks from the Horvat deal. Beauvillier was traded to the Chicago Blackhawks soon after, and the first-round pick was used in an acquisition involving Filip Hronek.
Impact of the Acquired Players
- Räty’s role has increased significantly, particularly in the past two seasons.
- Hronek has stepped up his game, especially after Quinn Hughes’ recent trade to the Minnesota Wild.
This shift in personnel raises questions about the team’s center depth, especially following Miller’s departure. Fans reflect on what might have been had the Canucks retained Horvat instead of Miller.
Horvat’s Performance Since the Trade
Horvat’s offensive performance has been noteworthy. As of the 2025–26 season, he has scored 19 goals and 12 assists in just 32 games. Before his injury, he ranked fourth in the NHL for goals scored, tied with Connor Bedard. In his first full season with the Islanders (2023–24), he recorded an impressive 33 goals.
Comparative Analysis of Player Contributions
Had the Canucks opted to trade Miller instead of Horvat, predicting the outcome of their playoff success is challenging. During the 2022–23 season, Miller led Vancouver in points with 103, contributing significantly to the team’s performance.
- Horvat’s scoring ability historically sat in the mid-20s range while with the Canucks.
- In contrast, Miller provided noticeable offensive production, which led to playoff advancement.
The Canucks’ strategy ultimately hinges on projecting future performance and team dynamics, considering their acquisitions and player development involved.
Future Considerations for the Canucks
The ramifications of the Horvat trade encompass numerous hypotheticals. For instance, if Vancouver had maintained Horvat, would they have traded for Elias Lindholm? The return on a potential Miller trade could have altered the team’s trajectory as well.
One significant consideration is that keeping Horvat would have allowed him to maintain his captaincy for another season, strengthening the team’s leadership structure. In contrast, handing the captaincy to a younger Quinn Hughes increased expectations but also pressure.
Conclusion
In retrospect, the decision to trade Horvat provided a year of team excellence. However, the subsequent seasons have raised doubts about whether this was a step forward for the organization. The consequences of this trade extend beyond simple statistics, influencing future player dynamics and team culture.



